Squatting
Q&A
<I
plan on adding the squat once I feel I've done enough lower back
work.>
I'm
not sure of the reasoning on this one. It's common thinking but
I don't think it's correct thinking. I believe nearly everyone can
do squats; where people get into trouble with them is in the excitement
of adding too much weight. Start with none to strengthen all the
muscles of the torso and legs.
Stand
up straight right now, feet about shoulder width apart. Lean over
and put your hand on your knees, sticking your rear end down and
back slightly. Take your hands off your knees and hold them out
parallel to the floor at about shoulder level, still in the partial
squat created by putting your hands on your knees.
Now,
squat down a little bit further with your hands still at shoulder
level. Straighten your legs and come back upright. Perfect squat.
Most people at this point can repeat the movement without the hand-on-knees
part. If you haven't done them before, a single set of 12 done with
no weight is a great place to get you going and you'll have a fire
burning for squats soon enough. Adding lots of weight (quickly as
we have a tendency to do) requires a stronger back, starting a beginning
squat programs does not.
Laree
<Do
you know the name of the guy who did something like squatted 1000lbs
and would give 1000 silver dollars to anyone who came up and squatted
the 1000 also? >
That
was Paul Anderson. And it was actually 1,200 pounds; the coins were
in two Plexiglass boxes on the ends of the bar. After competing
in the 1956 Olympics in Melbourne, Paul used his fame to help raise
money for the boys' homes he eventually built in Georgia. The way
he did it was to perform a strongman act in Las Vegas. The squat
challenge remained in place for a while, one that went unmet, and
he did the act several times a day! I don't know exactly how long
he did this, but he raised the money and opened the homes. He lost
his amateur status in the meantime, a terrible blow to American
weightlifting. The man had a dream, though, and our loss was great
gain for a lot of troubled kids over the years.
Steve
W.
<I've
read that a top bodybuilder says not to squat because it makes wider
hips, thicker waists and bigger butts.>
These
kinds of debates -- to squat or not to squat -- are what make bodybuilding
an art and not a science.
The
performance of the exercise has much to do with the affected muscle
groups. If you're targeting to lift as much weight as possible,
you are going to perform the exercise in such a way as to employ
as many muscle groups as possible. The unavoidable by-product of
this is powerfully developed BUT THICK waist and glutes. I cannot
recall having ever seen a top squatter with a wasp waist.
If one is targeting quad development while maintaining a tight,
small waistline, one tries to stay vertical, putting all the stress
on the quads. Using a 1" wood block under the heels helps this a
lot. Front squats and sissy squats are dynamite as well. Take a
look at the pics on Dave's site taken at Gold's in 1970 or the scenes
of Arnold and Ed Corney squatting in "Pumping Iron" for the proper
performance of a 'bodybuilding' squat.
If
a top bodybuilder made such a sweeping statement as indicated below,
he is way off base.
Bill2
-----
These
statements are anatomically not correct. It's impossible to widen
the hips. That concept shouldn't be too difficult to grasp. However,
it gives you full rounded buttock development (a good quality for
males or females), great outer thigh sweep and pretty much works
every other muscle in the body as well.
The
exercise will thicken your trunk, but not widen your hip bones.
It can give that illusion because it adds muscle mass to every aspect
of the glutes including where they insert near the hip. Another
illusion is the thickening of the thigh abductors. Bone structures
cannot be widened. Squats are great.
Best
Wishes,
Tim
*Phd. Health and Fitness*
<I'm
trying to shorten my leg workout and thinking stopping all the assistance
work.>
Don't
stop regular leg curls. The quickest way to start straining/pulling
the hamstring is when the quads become disproportionately strong
vis a vis the hamstrings. Everything in balance.
Bill2
Click
here to go back to the IOL
Leg Training Discussion Contents
|